A Message from Citizens for Limited Taxation Norm Paley
The following quotation is attributed to Alexander Fraser Tytler, economist and professor at Edingurgh University, writing at the time of the American Revolution.
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse (generous benefits) from the public treasury.
“From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
“The average age of the world’s great civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence:
“From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependence back to bondage.”
We are in my opinion in the next to the last stage of Tytler's warning. We have a public wanting more services and a government more than willing to provide them and an apathetic public unwilling to educate themselves as to why it costs so much. We are beginning to reach the point where government has grown so large and has become so powerful that they really don't care what the public thinks or what their programs cost. But those services do come with a price. Government tends to be a ferocious feeder. Feeding on our wealth and labor and always eager to add to their ranks workers dependant on the State, City or Town for their jobs. They then form unions to increase their wages and decrease their workload.
We pay for the School Department to educate our children to a level that will provide the best and the brightest a path to college or university. We also provide for the others a path to a decent job and decent living. I use the term path because we cannot make a promise that all children can, or desire to, make the effort to continue on to college and a great career.
The School System operates on the theory however that everything that possibly could be done will be done to make all children equal in their educational outcome. This is known as Outcome Based Education. The state joins them and provides mandates that while illegally unfunded are pursued none the less. In order to try to achieve these goals they have pursued several avenues. Small classes that make it easier for the teacher to give special attention to each student, specialist teachers to take up the slack for what the regular teacher can't, won't or has not been educated to do, and administrators and assistant administrators and principles and assistant principles all there to see that all the goals are met.
We then add the publishers of new curriculums all promising that their new method, or their new technique will suddenly enlighten even the most uninterested or challenged student. Most of these new programs have failed. The so called new math curriculum is the most recent and is being abandoned throughout most of the country. The cost of most of these new programs is exorbitant but is pushed with the same enthusiasm as the drug companies marketing the next new cure.
The cost will continue to grow as the size of the workforce grows to provide the service. There will come a point where we will no longer be able to fund this. We will either put an end to the insanity or we will vote with our feet and leave the town and then the state to find a school system where learning goes on at a more reasonable cost. The march out of Massachusetts has already begun. And an apathetic public continues to elect the officials responsible for the high cost and the poor performance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Apparently the writer forgets that currently all students have the choice to attend and participate or to remain home and be schooled by the experts there that always remain on the sideline critiquing the efforts of those educated to do the job. I am constantly amazed by the multitude of teaching experts in this community that do not spend an ounce of current real time in the classroom.
I also find it interesting that the writer now chooses to walk away from the responsibility of educating future generations by not wanting to contribute a fair share. Should those that need and receive additional services be charged thusly? Should the special ed student that requires a one on one aide pay for that privilege since it takes so much of the general fund away from the regular ed population? When is fair fair?
Rather than insult the average voter with a lemming analogy, perhaps the writer would volunteer his time to pay back the school district he so willingly accessed in the past.
I do wish the writer would offer a reasonable solution to issues rather than his usual critisism. Some of the schools are in a sorry state of disrepair. Budgetary constraints have forced the School Department to delay repairs year after year. Every homeowner knows that in the end the cost is greater.
What is his solution when we have more students than we have books and additional copies are not available for purchase. Does he truly feel that an administration that retrieves books from another town's dumpster is overspending?
Did he appreciate the additional cost of special education when his own children were receiving such services?
I disagree with his assertion that the public is apathetic. The public/parents of this town are very involved in offering their time and money. I wonder what the writer paid when his own children were in public school. Did he send in basic supplies every week. Did he send in sanitizing wipes for the cafeteria, art room and classrooms? Did he pay a bus fee, athletic fee, activity fee, parking fee? If an overide passes parents will still be paying all these additional costs. If the public was truly apathetic then the cafeterias would be closed by this point in the year for lack of cleaning supplies.
Lets keep the dialogue open and positive. Constructive critisism should, if possible, offer alternatives.
Post a Comment